How can a deaf-mute philanthropist be responsible the series of murders of which he stands accused when he has an iron-clad alibi and the killer purportedly spoke to a witness? Is he truly innocent, or is there more to this than meets the eye?
How can a deaf-mute philanthropist be responsible the series of murders of which he stands accused when he has an iron-clad alibi and the killer purportedly spoke to a witness? Is he truly innocent, or is there more to this than meets the eye?
